Month: November 2010
New technologies and the expansion of social networks worldwide appear to be leading us to a greater connection between people. but these networks create a real relationship and mutual between us? Currently, the types of relationships that develop between us are a reflection of a difficult situation because on the one hand, circumstances compel us to connect, but on the other, we are not very comfortable with this closeness so close between us. If we look at our relationships from this perspective, we could see work as a simulation of two extreme emotional states. On the one hand, we want to be with all, and secondly, we want to remain protected behind the screen of a computer or a mobile phone. It seems that the Internet does not really brings people together, but allows us to be connected to our separation. It is precisely this sense of disconnection to be getting worse, which reveals another type of need, a need for true union, a union that is impossible to achieve through digital cable or a virtual environment. The answer to this need, is a net improvement in our relations, transforming them into a more intimate and profound.
A type of network that is based on the association of ideas and desires, which run between us in a direct and natural. “Connecting People? (Connecting people) The time in which we live is a preparatory stage in the progressive development of humanity. At the end of process is the goal to partner again in a single system.
Because there are needs in organizations, there are feelings, there are frustrations, there are conflicts, there are conflicting positions. Paying no attention to these elements is to deny the reality that they are there. Manuel Barroso said: a good leader has to have time for himself and for his own, for the content and processes to the needs and everything that has to do with education tutors, guidance, support and above all make the development a reality. Now, when there is alignment of energy (time, attention and resources) are prosecuted in different directions and you lose focus. When the team is not aligned energy dispersion is waste of resources, there is rework, no waste, no motivation, there is a high staff turnover, dysfunctional conflicts exist, work ethic problems, these are signs that something is not alignment between employees and organization. But with the emerging alignment harmony, focus, unity of purpose and synergy. Processes are interdependent organizations (sales depends on administration and vice versa).
Thus systems, people, processes and technology are intertwined, and unless many people working in different functions of the organization are aligned and move together in the same direction, they tend to trample each other, leading to dysfunctional conflict, inefficiency and blur. When organization is not aligned islands are created within it. On each island, then, as people work off of other departments or sections, as each department becomes an end in itself, forgetting the vision system and process, which is what makes an effective organization achieve its goals.
The laminated flooring, successful product created in the 60s, saw a tough competitor to emerge in a short period of time reached unprecedented heights in market share: Laminate flooring. No intention of technical detail each of these competitors, we internalize the details and practical effects for the consumer that these two giants of the interior can offer. For the purpose of reaching a neophyte on the subject, here are the pros and cons and the competitive advantages of these materials, with a table of comparative attributes:
Resistance to Traffic: This item earns whole laminate flooring, its surface layer is significantly more resistant to the, where children live, laminate flooring is the most recommended. Fastness to tread: The floating platform will deliver the feel of walking on a pavement solvent, laminate flooring instead (except options of 10mm or more thick) is weaker (not least resistant). Maintenance and Cleaning: Both are low maintenance items, ergo, total convenience, however the laminate is more resistant to household chemicals and allows you to remove tough stains on wooden floors that would give up. Durability: If we take into account the handicap of recycling of floating platforms (allow 2 to 4 thin polished), this would win the tug of war, although we should not dismiss the laminate flooring brands that offer guarantees to wear over 25 years, no small feat. Appearance: Of course, in this side who stands out is the floating platform, it consists of natural wood, today, technology willing, laminated parquet in many cases makes difficult the perception of its artificiality by the human eye and and all, this difference is demonstrated by the wooden floors. Price: Generally speaking, the cost of the flooring is lower than the floating platforms, however there are premium brands that emulate the latter in price to many floating platforms. In this case, division number of slats in each table is inversely proportional to its price.