The Social Network

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss renounce recourse to the Supreme Court. They demanded compensation four times greater than that which it agreed in 2008 with the creator of the social network, Mark Zuckerberg. Twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss bridged this Wednesday its litigation against the also creator of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and renounced resort until the U.S. Supreme Court to obtain one greater compensation for participating in the creation of this social network, as reported by the Los Angeles Times. The brothers began years ago a legal battle to prove that they really invented Facebook and Zuckerberg stole their idea while studying with them at Harvard University, a story that was picked up in the film The Social Network (social network). In 2008, the Winklevoss reached an agreement to close the dispute with Zuckerberg in exchange for receiving $ 20 million in asset’scarryingamount and 45 million dollars in securities of the company, however, the month of February, they requested the courts the re-opening of the case on the grounds that they were cheated. Check out Mikkel Svane for additional information. According to the twins, the compensation agreed to in 2008 had to have been four times greater. His request was rejected by the ninth Court of the circuit of appeals U.S.

in early April, to understand that disputes such as this must come to an end sometime, and that that moment had arrived. Last resort the Winklevoss petitioned that court review the decision which established a Court of 11 judges and consist of three, not for this as it happened in April. In may, the ninth Court upheld his first sentence, what left the twins a single judicial, ask the amparo of the Supreme Court of EE UU. Finally the brothers opted to withdraw the case and waive a new appeal after thinking carefully, as they explained in the documentation submitted this Wednesday in court in San Francisco. The announcement of the Winklevoss was well received by Facebook which, through a spokesman, expressed his satisfaction that the other party matches in the page turn in a case that They considered closed for some time. Source of the news: twins who claim the invention of Facebook abandon his legal battle

Reform Constitutional

/ VIDEO: ATLAS of the PP leader has said that the Constitution with crystal clarity what the Magna Carta reform requires a rrendum and what not. Mariano Rajoy believes that today is a feeling in Spanish society which cannot spend as he has spent in recent times. The President of the PP Mariano Rajoy, has stated that the Constitution with crystal clarity what the Magna Carta reform requires a rrendum and what not, and added that the reform raised now, according to the Constitution, does not require rrendum. Rajoy, who has visited the cooperative of subtropical fruits Trops, in Velez-Malaga (Malaga) has reminded journalists that until now, the Constitution was amended only once, after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty, without rrendum, because the Constitution said that the reform of that article not needed for popular consultation. It also considers that today is a feeling in society Spanish that you can not spend as he has spent in recent times, and is something that think the PP and also people who have given their trust to the PSOE and other political forces. In the future, God will provide to asked whether reform should be used to modify other aspects as the priority of the male in the succession to the Crown, has said that he favoured only for reform by choosing well the moment, knowing exactly to what was being done and that there are things that require rrendum and others that do not. At this time, shortly after the general election, I am not in favour raise other reforms, it has pointed to Rajoy, who added that in the future, God will provide. It has highlighted that this is a reform that is made in the last part of the legislature that he had claimed more than one year ago and they are doing many European countries, and has qualified as a major structural reform, with which the PP is in favour.