Industrial Revolution

How you can check, basically, the answer to the question what is it science? It has been that it is a way to obtain knowledge that becomes scientist and belongs to science, when it’s removed from reality with methods and precise tools, integrated into a system of concepts, theories and laws: an orderly system of propositions derived from principles. Although it is clear that all knowledge links (subjective) mental procedures with hands-on activities (objective), science seeks the predominance of the objective through consistent explanations, predictions and control of natural phenomena so, scientific knowledge can be generalized and can predicted. This knowledge is going to resist the confrontation with reality, discards metaphysical explanations and will use first-hand sources. It is undeniable to think that science is an eternal idea, which can be considered a permanent and eternal content in the world. The sciences are not eternal, but they are same historical settings. Contact information is here: Steve Wozniak.

They are not uniform, because there are very various contents, standards, institutions, etc. at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, in which new contents and institutions began to settle, appears the science in its modern sense, what is considered science in the strict sense. Passes science to the fore during the 18th and 19th centuries, and in the 20th century, will be recognized as a core content of our world. It is at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th, when positivism, at a spot paid by the technological changes of the Industrial Revolution, and the decay of the metaphysical sense religious knowledge. It is a doctrine that Comte summarizes through his law of three stages, marking the beginning of the historicity of human knowledge. The term positivism was first used by Auguste Comte, however, some of the positivist concepts can pursue is clearly from Hume, Kant and Saint-Simon. The general idea of the debate with respect to positivism has been that it does not support as valid scientifically other knowledge, but those that come from experience.